Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Wooded Village

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guild Journeyer
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma City, OK USA
    Posts
    112

    Default

    I talked to the boss at the Water Board, I think there's a difference between the altitude for a photo of a 5 mile wide lake and and 15 ft wide tree. They are all just specks of green.

    My current boss goes flying with her son in a private plane, she'll she what she can do for us.

    With either option I know I could get the creative commons license, no worries there. It's just a matter of logistics.

  2. #2
    Guild Artisan su_liam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Port Alberta, Regina(IRL: Eugene, OR)
    Posts
    798

    Default

    Yeah, you know, 'cause weenies who object to little kites flying over don't at all mind being buzzed by light airplanes. Heehee. Pulling your chain, dude.

    I would join Redrobes in indebtedness to anyone who can put out good tree and house freebies. Photographic or otherwise.

  3. #3
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,201
    Blog Entries
    8

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by GlennZilla View Post
    I talked to the boss at the Water Board, I think there's a difference between the altitude for a photo of a 5 mile wide lake and and 15 ft wide tree. They are all just specks of green.
    Definitely, I have had a few friends and the odd family member do a hot air balloon flight. I tell them with fervent pleading to take some photos straight down. They take off from a field and pass over the odd tree maybe but you quickly gain enough height that the photos merge to a green cloth. Also the shots must be vertical straight down. You cant fix up angled pics. Ill post what I have, some are workable but less so that you might initially think. These are my best I have and I dont think they are good enough as they lack detail. I reckon the RC plane or the kite would be best with the right kind of altitude.

    Edit: The last one is a bit surreal. If nothing else it gives great reference material for anyone wanting to draw trees from above ! These were taken April 2007 and whilst very grateful to the family member for trying with these I cant make a single tree icon out of them. As a texture it might work. Might have to push number two through the seamless tex creator script over in the tut section.

    Edit 2: Added seamless tile of image 2
    Last edited by Redrobes; 02-07-2008 at 05:20 PM.

  4. #4
    Community Leader pyrandon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan, USA
    Posts
    1,341

    Default

    These are a good--no, a GREAT start! I am very excited about this! Go, Redrobes, go!
    Don
    My gallery is here
    __________________________________________________ _______
    "Keep your mind in hell, but despair not." --Saint Silouan [1866-1938]

  5. #5

    Default

    Very nice, Redrobes! I'm copying your post for the texture thread in the mapping elements forum! Do you think these textures would work as a seamless fill? Probably not, I'm guessing as you would have bits of trees cut off at the edges. Clone stamp maybe?

  6. #6
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,201
    Blog Entries
    8

    Post

    You must have missed the update yesterday where I added the seamless version of image number two. But I would like to get icons (clone stamps) out of the images and these images do not have enough res or clean enough trees to get at them well. What I would like is old oak in summer - you know, fluffy green stuff like model train sets have and some conifers too. My app can bunch a whole load together or mix them up and create textures for that if I had a selection of really good icons to use.

  7. #7

    Post

    No, I was just being blind...hadn't realised that the last image was a seamless tile. I did a google for 'architectural trees' and found this site , (sample image below) which sells images of trees seen top down but it looks like 3 modelling rather than the real thing and at $75 it's not cheap! You can download Bryce 5.5 for free, I think and that has a tree modeller. The models are not much to write home about, but they may look better if seen from above, and you can make alpha channels for the render too and make transparent .pngs out of them.

    I'll have a play tonight and see how they look.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	trees.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	73.3 KB 
ID:	2294  

  8. #8
    Administrator Redrobes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,201
    Blog Entries
    8

    Post

    They're cool. Whats your take on this... If you used a proprietary 3D model of a tree or even an app to generate random trees and took a screenie from above then can you distribute the image of the tree ?

    Speed Tree :- http://www.speedtree.com/tree_browser/index.htm is a bit of a daddy when it comes to this as its used in a lot of places and games. There is a demo where (at least a few years ago at any rate) you could whoop up some random stuff and select the viewpoint including from above. The demo had a handful of models to try and get the idea where the full set gives you loads. But I chose not to use them because I don't want to get tied up in any kind of copyright spat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •