I really like this map, especially the evergreen tree forest near the top. I love the style of drawing you used for that. I have only one question. Why is there no scale bar so a navigator can tell how far he has travelled on your map?
I really like this map, especially the evergreen tree forest near the top. I love the style of drawing you used for that. I have only one question. Why is there no scale bar so a navigator can tell how far he has travelled on your map?
https://www.cartographersguild.com/a...p?albumid=4718
My CC3+ Symbols https://cartographersguild.com/album.php?albumid=5194
My deviantart profile: https://crawfordcartography.deviantart.com/
Good question Tonnichiwa!
There are actually two answers. The first is the fact that from north to south, the scale difference is quite huge, so a single scale just wouldn't do it. I could have used a variable scale like the one below, but that would imply drawing geographical parallels as well, while this map is all about the medieval-ish feel (so no parallels but crazy windrose lines). I've done a tiny bit of research, and it seems portolan maps (which I based my windrose lines on) didn't have scales, at least not in the modern sense. They did however represent port-to-port distances, which I have left out. Maybe a good idea for a future map?
(Source: Bemidji State University)
The second reason for not having a scale is probably a bit less impressive - it's called the "Get It Over And Done With Syndrome". I won't have much time for mapmaking in the weeks to come, and I didn't feel like dragging this one out for longer than necessary. Usually I try to come up with a scale indeed (as a geographer, I was taught to always have a legend, a scale and a windrose in my maps!), but working out little details like that tend to take a LOT of time, especially if you want to draw all of them yourself. Time I didn't have. So I dropped the scalebar .
Check out my portfolio!