Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Can I can semi accurately measure distance anywhere while using Equirectangular?

  1. #11
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    18

    Default

    I would like to use one but the map is has a height to width ratio of 2:1 so one has to be double if there is a way where it is all the same please let me know

  2. #12
    Administrator waldronate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The High Desert
    Posts
    3,561

    Default

    The Equirectangular projection (in the plate caree or geographic aspect most commonly used) allocates equal amounts of angular resolution (latitude and longitude) to linear image resolution (pixels wide and high). The distance from one point on the equator all the way around the world to that point again is 360 degrees. The distance from the north pole to the south pole is 180 degrees and then back around to the north pole is another 180 degrees. An Equirectangular map has a vertical extent from the north pole to the south pole (180 degrees) and a horizontal extent from a point on the equator all the way around the globe back to that point (360 degrees). That's where the 2:1 ratio comes from. If you measure on your globe, it's 24000-odd miles around the equator and 12000-odd miles from pole to pole. That makes the resolution the same vertically at every point on the map (12000 miles / 180 degrees) as it is on the equator of the map (24000 miles / 360 degrees).

  3. #13
    Guild Grand Master Azélor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Québec
    Posts
    3,363

    Default

    A 2:1 ratio means the image width is twice the height but the vertical and horizontal scale are the same. The distance is doubled but the scale remains the same.
    Well assuming you are using an equirectangular projection. Different projections have different ratio.

    Van der Grinten for instance is a 1:1 ratio projection. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_de...ten_projection
    With this projection, youyr reasoning would make sense but not with equirectangular unless

  4. #14
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Oh this was my problem, I thought it was supposed to also be the same distance around as it was from pole to pole thanks!

  5. #15
    Guild Novice
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    18

    Default

    If I were to just move a continent up to the equator temporarily would I then be able to get a feel for how big it is on the map?

  6. #16
    Administrator waldronate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The High Desert
    Posts
    3,561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The King of Nipples View Post
    If I were to just move a continent up to the equator temporarily would I then be able to get a feel for how big it is on the map?
    Only if you reproject it properly. https://www.maptoglobe.com/ might be helpful if you have an Equirectangular map.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •