Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Professionals: How do you show your styles?

  1. #1
    Guild Novice CassMerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    9

    Question Professionals: How do you show your styles?

    Hey, hope this is the right place to ask this!

    I'm in the process of remaking my demos and I wanted to know what folks have found is good practice when setting out your different styles, so people know what you can do and can articulate what they want more easily. Any advice or opinions would be very much appreciated! This is what I'm using at the moment Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cropped-Fanciness-levels.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	782.7 KB 
ID:	136460

  2. #2
    Professional Artist Tiana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada!
    Posts
    1,768

    Default

    I just show my previously finished client work and that's pretty much it, people just say "I like that one" or "I want mountains like this one and colors like that one".

    I don't see a significant difference between 2 and 3. 1 and the others, sure (not shaded versus shaded with more detailed terrain) but if I were shopping I don't think it would be quite clear to me what defines 'quite fancy' to you. I don't think it's a strong enough distinction even though it may feel like a huge difference to you as an artist.

    Click my banner, behold my art! Fantasy maps for Dungeons and Dragons, RPGS, novels.
    No obligation, free quotes. I also make custom PC / NPC / monster tokens.
    Contact me: calthyechild@gmail.com or _ti_ (Discord) to discuss a map!


  3. #3
    Guild Novice CassMerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiana View Post
    I just show my previously finished client work and that's pretty much it, people just say "I like that one" or "I want mountains like this one and colors like that one".

    I don't see a significant difference between 2 and 3. 1 and the others, sure (not shaded versus shaded with more detailed terrain) but if I were shopping I don't think it would be quite clear to me what defines 'quite fancy' to you. I don't think it's a strong enough distinction even though it may feel like a huge difference to you as an artist.
    Thanks! I always thought 2 and 3 had the biggest difference so it's good to know that doesn't come across well, I was trying to distinguish mainly between flat-style land and coastlines vs a more landscape-y approach with elevation being detailed beyond mountains.

  4. #4
    Community Leader Kellerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    South Scotland (originally Finland)
    Posts
    2,807

    Default

    I'm not sure I entirely agree on what Tiana said. While I do think the difference between 2 and 3 is more subtle than the jump from 1 to 3, there is still a big difference in the detail level.

    As for my own approach, I personally make the biggest difference between colour levels in my own work. As you can see in my portfolio, I roughly divide my maps between greyscale, partial colour and full colour. I've also made the choice to set up parchment maps as a separate category on my website (even though they are just partial colour maps), just because it's by far the most popular option among my clients.

    I also have this image on hand that I can send to clients when negotiating a new project, if they don't have an idea of their desired colour level from the start:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Colour_examples.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	1.45 MB 
ID:	136465

    I don't know how well this would translate to your work, but having a portfolio separated into different map categories might work for you as well.
    Homepage | Instagram | Facebook | Artstation
    Just give me liquorice and nobody gets hurt.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •